• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Kriminalomsorgens høgskole og utdanningssenter KRUS
  • KRUS - Publikasjoner
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Kriminalomsorgens høgskole og utdanningssenter KRUS
  • KRUS - Publikasjoner
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Forvaring - erfaringer og utfordringer

Johnsen, Berit
Book
Thumbnail
View/Open
Forvaring.pdf (315.2Kb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/160592
Date
2008
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • KRUS - Publikasjoner [98]
Abstract
This publication is a result of a conference about preventive detention that took

place at The Correctional Service of Norway Staff Academy June 12, 2007. The

purpose of the conference was to gather the different services that are involved in

the criminal proceedings of preventive detention – the police, the prosecuting

authority, the courts, the experts on forensic psychiatry, the lawyers, the

correctional services and those who are convicted to preventive detention – in

order to create a dialogue. Research over the years the law of preventive detention

has existed, has revealed a need for such a dialogue. Nearly 150 persons from

different services participated at the conference, which shows that there is a great

interest in the subject.

The title “Preventive detention – experiences and challenges” reflects that the

papers presented at the conference and which are published in this report, focus on

the past as well as the future. The report presents the experiences and challenges

of preventive detention from different stands: the political, the forensic psychiatry,

the courts, the prisons, the probation service, the prosecuting authority, the

lawyers and the convicted.

The new law on preventive detention took effect on January 1, 2002. The purpose

of the law is to protect the public from offenders that are considered to be

dangerous. In principle, there is no upper time limit to a preventive detention

sentence. However, when the court convicts a person to preventive detention it

has to set a time frame, which cannot exceed 21 years. The court can prolong the

sentence, if it considers the convicted person to be still too dangerous to release.
Publisher
Kriminalomsorgens utdanningssenter
Series
Rapport;4/2008

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit